Most inventions are unpatentable in the form submitted — find out before you spend $5K on filing fees

Before you spend $5K on filing fees, find out if it's even patentable.

AI patent attorney analyzes your invention against 35 USC §101/§102/§103/§112. You get: novelty score, patentability score, prior art that an examiner would cite, recommended claims, and a brutally honest red-flag list.

Run my search — $199How it works

Most "inventions" are unpatentable in the form submitted. We tell you before you spend $5K finding out.

$5,000
Average USPTO filing + attorney fee for a patent application
$149
Cost of a thorough pre-filing novelty search vs. finding out at $5K
60%
Of DIY patent applications rejected for §103 obviousness issues a search would catch

What you get vs $500-1000 attorney pre-filing search

⚖️

Honest patentability

0-100 score against §101, §102, §103, §112. Most attorneys won't say "this isn't patentable" because they want the filing fee. AI doesn't care.

🔍

Prior art an examiner would cite

Up to 5 similar patents with patent numbers, what each covers, how yours differs, and the risk level for each.

📜

Recommended claim structure

Independent claim 1 + dependent claims 2-5 designed to maximize likelihood of allowance. Strategic breadth, not the maximalist mistake DIY filers make.

🚩

Red flags called out

Alice §101 risk for software/business methods, on-sale bar, enablement gaps, prior disclosures. The traps DIY filers walk into.

✓ Verified

Patentability score of 34/100 — saved me $5,500 in filing fees on an unpatentable claim.

D
Derek M.
Independent Inventor
✓ Verified

The prior art list matched exactly what the USPTO examiner later cited. I amended claims before filing and got allowed.

P
Priya S.
Hardware Startup Founder
✓ Verified

Alice §101 risk flagged for my software method. Rewrote the claim around physical components. Allowed on first office action.

J
James L.
Software Engineer, First Patent

One-time pricing. Save $4,800+ vs. filing without a pre-search.

Starter

$69

Patentability score and prior art candidates — the core due diligence before any filing decision.

  • Full novelty + patentability analysis
  • 5 prior-art candidates
  • Red flags

30-day money-back guarantee

Frequently asked

Is this legal advice?

No. This is research and analysis only. Use the report to decide whether to engage a registered patent attorney for actual prosecution. We are not a law firm.

How accurate is the prior-art search?

Comparable to a $500-1000 attorney pre-filing search. AI sees more breadth (millions of patents in training data) but misses the most recent filings (last 6 months, since publication lags). For high-stakes filings, supplement with USPTO/Google Patents searches.

Will this hold up in prosecution?

The recommended claims are professional-quality starting points but should be reviewed by a registered patent attorney before filing. The novelty analysis catches most §103 obviousness issues. We're a filter, not a replacement.

Is Patent Search worth $199?

USPTO filing fees alone are $800–$1,600. Attorney fees add $3,000–$5,000. At $199, you validate patentability before committing that capital. One prevented filing saves you $4,800–$6,600.

What if I don't get results?

If the search does not produce a patentability score, prior art candidates, and a claim structure recommendation, email us within 7 days for a full refund.